Curse

Age · Feb 15, 2007, 11:42 PM // 23:42

Quote:

Originally Posted by -Loki-

Warrior - 4 swords, 3 axes, 3 hammers, 2 shields, 2 sets of armour, stoneskin gloves, 4 helmets.

Ranger - 8 bows, 1 hammer, 3 sets of armour.

Monk - 1 1/2 bags of weapons (staffs, wands, foci, sword, shields), 2 sets of armour, multiple headgear.

Yes, making PvP ready characters takes up a hell of a lot of space, and when you want to go do some PvE, there's not a lot of space left for drops. And this is only 3 of my characters, and not including storage or what mods and the like the characters are carrying.

That is the good thing about have 1 or 2 mules around if you can remember where put them.

Thallandor · Feb 16, 2007, 01:37 AM // 01:37

Sorry but this thread makes me laugh.

Tyrnne · Feb 16, 2007, 01:47 AM // 01:47

No and no.

They could throw in some more storage space in the next chapter - that might make sense in that someone who owned all 4 chapters would potentially have 10 characters and more need for storage.

This probably belongs in the idea forum and even then I would suggest that people not come up with ideas for game enhancements that we would have to pay for.

Gregslot · Feb 16, 2007, 02:14 AM // 02:14

No

No

12 letters

VanishingLight · Feb 16, 2007, 03:47 AM // 03:47

No I wouldn't. If they should be short on funds I would rather pay a little bit more for the game itself than a monthly fee.

You just got tomahawked · Feb 16, 2007, 03:55 AM // 03:55

The thing most people forget is; We don't have to pay a subscription but we still hvae to spend $50.00 on the game and if they want to continue to have us pay $50.00 they must keep us happy.

Pwny Ride · Feb 16, 2007, 04:24 AM // 04:24

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vandal2k6

1) More storage space

2) The ability to use an auction system

I know one of the main points of GW is the fact we don't need to pay a subscription. However I reckon some of the reasons we don't get some of these things (I may be wrong here) is that it'll take more server space/usage which in the end costs Anet. If this is true, would you be willing to pay a small subscription ($2 a month maybe?) to have more storage and a decent working in-game auction.

This would be a totally optional thing, with the game staying exactly as is for the most part, but with the option to pay for this service (like the crafting material upgrade but for real money). This is not a sudgestion so this is why I've put it here and not in the idea forum. Just wondered what people thought?

No i would not pay for either, since a-net owes us these anyway

Terra Xin · Feb 16, 2007, 04:58 AM // 04:58

A subscription fee for those two things??

That's a little... why?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pwny Ride

No i would not pay for either, since a-net owes us these anyway

Oh, sit down. They don't owe you anything that you haven't already paid for.

explodemyheart · Feb 16, 2007, 05:02 AM // 05:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pwny Ride

No i would not pay for either, since a-net owes us these anyway

I've noticed that you seem to have severe entitlement issues. Anet doesn't owe you anything, you already got what you paid for and that is the game as it comes.

Former Ruling · Feb 16, 2007, 05:10 AM // 05:10

The general poll is obviously noone would ever pay monthly for GW unless some MAJOR changes happened that aren't going to happen.

The only reason GW ever even got popular was because it was free. Honestly the only reason I picked it up at the store over WoW was the one-time buying fee only.

Sunchips · Feb 16, 2007, 06:18 AM // 06:18

yeah, NO to your questions, and i use this site for auctions anyways

-Loki- · Feb 16, 2007, 06:24 AM // 06:24

Quote:

Originally Posted by explodemyheart

I've noticed that you seem to have severe entitlement issues. Anet doesn't owe you anything, you already got what you paid for and that is the game as it comes.

People get the idea Arenanet owes them an Auction House and additional storage space for free because they said they would add them for free. Hey, wait a minute...

Riceboi · Feb 16, 2007, 06:33 AM // 06:33

The only thing I would pay for is for Anet to undo the AoE nerf. Undo it only for me that is.

Naf Olbaid · Feb 16, 2007, 06:36 AM // 06:36

I would NEVER pay a monthly subscription for this game, it is simply not good enough to warrant a subscription, people know this. Guild Wars is the poor mans WoW, or the man who does not want to forfeit their life into a game(WoW). If you have the free time available(you will need.... a lot) and have no quarrels with paying a subscription then you should be playing WoW.

It's a joke if you are foolish enough spend countless hours in guild wars, there is simply not enough content and the time spent would be completely wasted. At least in WoW you can consistently upgrade your character into infinity, the game features(auction house, crafting, everything, character movement(you can JUMP and climb over objects instead of being glued to a static grid on the ground and not being able to walk on a patch of grass)) and quality is superior (no instanced world is fantastic, guild wars cannot afford this due to not having a subscription fee) and the game / campaign does not finish after 12 hours of play.

*note this is not a guild wars bash post, I favor this game over WoW for reasons stated in my post*

God Apprentice · Feb 16, 2007, 10:59 AM // 10:59

No and No

I would like to see a bigger storage though.

Clord · Feb 16, 2007, 11:01 AM // 11:01

Not want to pay 2$ month from some extras make me think Scrooge.